Papers on risks of mRNA vaccines - and on harms of mask-wearing

You may find this paper of interest. By J. Bart Classen, MD, of Classen Immunotherapies:

COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease

Choice excerpts:

"Vaccines have been found to cause a host of chronic, late developing adverse events. Some adverse events like type 1 diabetes may not occur until 3-4 years after a vaccine is administered. In the example of type 1 diabetes the frequency of cases of adverse events may surpass the frequency of cases of severe infectious disease the vaccine was designed to prevent. Given that type 1 diabetes is only one of many immune mediated diseases potentially caused by vaccines, chronic late occurring adverse events are a serious public health issue."

"The Pfizer RNA based COVID-19 vaccine was approved by the US FDA under an emergency use authorization without long term safety data. Because of concerns about the safety of this vaccine a study was performed to determine if the vaccine could potentially induce prion based disease."

"The current analysis indicates Pfizer's RNA based COVID-19 vaccine contains many of these RNA sequences that have been shown to have high affinity for TDP-43 or FUS and have the potential to induce chronic degenerative neurological diseases."

"Zinc binding to the RNA recognition motif of TDP-43 is another mechanism leading to formation of amyloid like aggregations. The viral spike protein, coded by the vaccine RNA sequence, binds ACE2 an enzyme containing zinc molecules. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc levels leading to prion disease."

"Data is not publicly available to provide information on how long the vaccine RNA is translated in the vaccine recipient and how long after translation the spike protein will be present in the recipient’s cells. Such studies pertaining to in vivo expression will be complex and challenging. Genetic diversity protects species from mass casualties caused by infectious agents. One individual may be killed by a virus while another may have no ill effects from the same virus. By placing the identical receptor, the spike protein, on cells of everyone in a population, the genetic diversity for at least one potential receptor disappears. Everyone in the population now becomes potentially susceptible to binding with the same infectious agent."

You may have noticed that US and EU authorities have been swift to react to vaccine side effects in J&J and Astra Zeneca vaccines, which do not use mRNA. I'm not saying these are safe – in my opinion, they are just as unsafe as any vaccine released without long-term testing. Yet, in many cases, administration of these vaccines has paused with bad publicity, while the administration of mRNA vaccines continues. You are free to speculate about why that might be.

It is worth noting, when observing world events over decades, cynical "conspiracy theories" tend to be proven true. Meanwhile, hypotheses that assume good intentions by the ruling elites tend to be proven naive, gullible, and stupid.

In this case, it's no big deal – the stakes are just your life. Good luck!

While we're on the topic...

As everyone should know by now, face masks of cloth are dumb and ineffective, and their only purpose is to serve as a symbol of fear, submission and compliance with authorities, regardless of the nonsense they come up with.

Paper on the harm and ineffectiveness of face masks by Baruch Vainshelboim, VA Palo Alto / Stanford University:

Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis

Choice excerpt and conclusion:

"According to the current knowledge, the virus SARS-CoV-2 has a diameter of 60 nm to 140 nm [nanometers (billionth of a meter)], while medical and non-medical facemasks’ thread diameter ranges from 55 µm to 440 µm [micrometers (one millionth of a meter), which is more than 1000 times larger. Due to the difference in sizes between SARS-CoV-2 diameter and facemasks thread diameter (the virus is 1000 times smaller), SARS-CoV-2 can easily pass through any facemask. In addition, the efficiency filtration rate of facemasks is poor, ranging from 0.7% in non-surgical, cotton-gauze woven mask to 26% in cotton sweeter material."

"The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health."

You can also just look at this graph (via Kyle Becker on Twitter):

Or this one, comparing North Dakota to South Dakota:

Or you can check out this article:

Texas and Florida Continue to Beat Lockdown States: Fauci ‘Not Sure’ Why Open States are Winning

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to not break a sweat and get buff in 15 years

The US corporatocracy: A proto-totalitarianism

The horrid beeping of Tripp Lite UPS